Put a man in space, away from the gravitational bondage of the earth’s surface, and he will feel weightlessness. Although all mass in the Universe will still affect it gravitationally, they also will attract any spacecraft, in which the person is, so it will float. And yet on TV they showed us that the crew of a space ship quite successfully walks up the floor under any conditions. To do this, use the artificial gravity created by the plants on Board a fantastic ship. As close to real science?
Captain Gabriel Lorca on the bridge “discovery” during a simulated battle with klingonese. The entire crew extends the artificial gravity, and this would have been the Canon
Regarding gravity, great discovery of Einstein was the equivalence principle: the uniform acceleration of the reference system are indistinguishable from a gravitational field. If you were on a rocket and could not see the Universe through the window, you would have had no idea about what’s going on: you pull down the force of gravity or the acceleration of the rocket in a certain direction? Such was the idea which led to the General theory of relativity. 100 years later is the most correct description of gravity and acceleration, which we know.
Identical to the behavior of the ball, falling to the floor in a flying rocket (left) and on Earth (right), demonstrates the Einstein equivalence principle
There is another trick, according to Ethan Siegel, which we can use if we want to: we can force the spacecraft to rotate. Instead of linear acceleration (like a rocket thrust) can be made to work a centripetal acceleration that a man on Board could feel the outer hull of a spacecraft, pushing it to the center. This technique was used in “Space Odyssey 2001 year”, and if your ship was big enough, artificial gravity would be indistinguishable from the real thing.
Only here for one thing. These three types of acceleration — gravity, linear and rotational, the only one which we can use to simulate the effects of gravity. And this is a huge problem for spacecraft.
The concept of the station in 1969, which was assembled in orbit from spent stages of the Apollo program. The station was to rotate on its Central axis to create artificial gravity
Why? Because if you want to go to another star system, you will need to accelerate your ship to get there, then slow it down on arrival. If you are not able to protect themselves from these accelerations, you’re in for a disaster. For example, to accelerate to full impulse in Star trek, to a few percent of light speed, will have to test the acceleration of 4000 g. It is 100 times more acceleration, which is starting to impede the blood flow in the body.
The launch of the space Shuttle Columbia in 1992, showed that the acceleration takes place over a long period. The acceleration of the spacecraft will be many times higher, and the human body will not be able to cope with it
If you do not want to be weightless during long journeys — not to expose yourself to a terrible biological wear and tear like loss of muscle and bone mass — the body constantly needs to be power. For any other hand it is quite easy to do. In electromagnetism, for example, you could place the crew in conducting the cockpit and external electric fields have simply disappeared. It would be possible to arrange two parallel plates in and get a constant electric field pushes the charges in a certain direction.
If gravity worked the same way.
Such thing as a gravitational conductor, simply does not exist, and to protect themselves from the gravitational forces. It is impossible to create a homogeneous gravitational field in a region of space, for example, between two plates. Why? Because unlike the electric force generated by positive and negative charges, there is only one type of gravitational charge is mass-energy. Gravitational force always attracts, and she is nowhere to hide. You can only use three type of acceleration — gravity, linear and rotational.
The overwhelming majority of quarks and leptons in the Universe is made of matter, but each of them there are antiparticles of antimatter, gravitational mass which is not defined
The only way by which you could create artificial gravity, which will protect you from the consequences of the acceleration of your ship and will provide you with continuous thrust down without acceleration, will be available if you open particles of negative gravitational mass. All the particles and antiparticles, which we found still have positive mass, but the inertial mass, that is, they can only be judged when creating or accelerating particles. Inertial mass and gravitational mass are the same for all particles that we know, but we never checked his idea of antimatter or antiparticles.
Currently, experiments are being conducted for this part. The ALPHA experiment at CERN created antihydrogen: a stable form of neutral antimatter, and working to isolate her from all other particles. If the experiment will be sensitive enough we will be able to measure how the antiparticle falls in a gravitational field. If it falls down, like ordinary matter, then it has positive gravitational mass and can be used for the construction of gravity conduit. If you fall up in a gravitational field, it changes everything. Only one result, and the artificial gravity can suddenly become possible.
The possibility of obtaining artificial gravity incredibly beckons us, but based on the existence of negative gravitational mass. Antimatter may be a lot, but we have not proved
If antimatter has negative gravitational mass, creating a field of ordinary matter and of antimatter, we could create a field of artificial gravity which is always pulling you down. Creating gravity-conductive shell of the hull of our spacecraft, we would protect the crew from the forces of ultra-fast acceleration, which otherwise would be fatal. And that the coolest people in space that would not experience more negative physiological effects, which are now stalking the astronauts. But until we find a particle with negative gravitational mass, the artificial gravity will be obtained only at the expense of acceleration.
Why don’t we have artificial gravity in space?
Ilya Hel