Giedo vd Garde versus Sauber: the lawsuit in 5 facts
Posted on 09-03-2015 at 9:25 by sir_smokalot – 51 Comments”
Earlier today served in Australia, the summary proceedings of Giedo van der Garde at Sauber, that with the advent of Nasrs bag of money suddenly amnesia suffering, and had forgotten that our fellow countryman already has a contract had been signed. This is what happened.
Although it is a busy day for the actors we need for a definitive judgment of the Australian court to Wednesday the wait, until then the session is suspended. The court action today resulted in, however, lots of entertainment and even more ‘man man man’-just a few short moments. So are the cases for:
1) Van Der Garde has a valid contract
What exactly is responsible is not known, but van der Garde says Sauber him a seat was guaranteed, until Ericsson and Nasr were fixed.
2) Van Der Garde has a superlicentie
Yes, quite everyone knows. He was, after all, already 18 times for Caterham in action during the 2013 season. The lawyers of Sauber claimed, however, to the contrary, in the courtroom.
3) Van Der Garde has his sponsorverplichtingen met
As a son-in-law of billionaire Marcel Debates you don’t have a bat to bite. There is simply deposited money, so no reason for breach of contract.
4) The Swiss court asked Van Der Garde all in the same.
Giedo traveled to Australia with a court ruling in his favor from Saubers home country of Switzerland in your pocket. Nevertheless, it attracts the Alpenbewoners not about the streak, what has to do with point 5.
5) The Sauber is not for Van Der Garde made to measure
F1 racing is tailor-made. A driver must have a (number of) session(s) chair adjust so that the car exactly to his dimensions is made. At vd Garde is not done, so the lawyers in the court argued that to let him deelenemen life threatening, strengthened by the fact that the unemployed Giedo has not trained with the new Sauber, and so ‘not familiar’ with the car. “It would result in an unacceptable risk of physical harm or even death,“ says Saubers lawyer.
Thursday – if the statement just a day – to start the free practice in Melbourne. Giedo wins clear 4 rounds on points, only the fifth point speaks for Sauber. A broadly based suspicion is that van der Garde drives on a compensation then, for the Manor team in action. Continued.