TO continues 6 officials regarding procurement of Defence/Police [updated]

Posted on 10-07-2015 at 14:07 by sir_smokalot – 53 Comments”

Twee Golfjes van de pliesie
The dubious award of police and army in 2010, gets a pony-tail. The Public Prosecutor believes sufficient evidence to have at least 6 officials for corruption to continue.

A small geheugenopfrisser: in 2010 he won importer Pon a contract for police and army vehicles, which directly argued that the goods were not completely honest were expired. This led in 2011 to an investigation, and eventually in 2014 to an official corruptiezaak after which the purchasing department of the police under the microscope was taken.

Prosecution

Today made it known on the basis of research of the national department of criminal investigation of two police officers and four officials of the defense criminal to prosecute.

Not only officials, but also automobielbedrijven and employees of these companies are under a magnifying glass. A decision on any prosecution of a total of 47 suspects is later taken. As a ‘lubricant’ (enter here your Volkswagen + lubricant-joke) would, among other cheap lease and huurconstructies are raised, discount on maintenance, the use of tankpassen, adoption of winter tyres and (distant) foreign travel, including all-expense-paid weeklong cruises on the Mediterranean Sea. Sounds like a way of innovation where a Fyra-buyer almost would be jealous, right?

According to the TO had analysed tenders related to the purchase of 1667 VW Amaroks with the associated maintenance for defense and 1330 persons and company cars per year for the police. For the people in the verdachtenbankje they have – off the record a little message. Word…continued (sorry, that was too easy).

UPDATE: We have had contact with the press officer of the National public prosecutor’s office and this informs us that the other defendants are employed by the PON, Renault, Peugeot and some leasing companies. The role of PON, however, seems to be the greatest in this case, all the more because the importer is ultimately both tenders knew.