Government corruption draws Pon the truth because of faulty Bentleys
Posted on 25-03-2014 at 20:18 by CasperH – 111 Comments”
An ordinary relletje between two Dutch billionaires escalates such that one of the two now the media are looking for.
It is of course not nice if you are a part of your billions transfer to the account of Pon for a brand spanking new Bentley Mulsanne á €425.000 euro and that the car was within three quarters of a year and 20,000 miles so many problems that you decide the bitch with fat loss to trade in on a (again) new Bentley Flying Spur. You also get a barrel, or 2.5 to 3 cost. Still more acidic it is as well that the Flying Spur after 1500 miles already decide you should go for a walk. “I have to let him inspect and he is rejected. That thing must way no more.”
It is the story of Hans Melchers, the number thirteen of the Quote 500 with a rated power of at least nine zeros before the comma knows. Hans, therefore, decided an angry mail to Wijnand Pon, is a shareholder of Pon, and in addition, owner of a farm that stierensperma trades. It was Wijnand Pon a rated power of 2 billion euro, good for place 5 on the Quote 500 last year. The mail:
Dear Wijnand,
Thank you for your valued response as a result of the two miskopen, once a Mulsanne brand new and other times Flying Spur brand new.
Unfortunately, I feel by Pon Luxury Cars so lit that light for me is red.
I will now work on all media (both the good and the bad) nationally and internationally to inform of the fact that I by the board of directors of your company being scammed. They refuse time after time to the new Flying Spur to pay it back. The car is in my garage and after an official neatly in such a way kaduuk found that there is, from the viewpoint of security, not to should be driven. I have been once cheated by Pon Cars and am just willing the car to Pon back to deliver after I the amount that I kutauto paid have on my bank account credited get.
Sorry that I onparlementair write, but you Wijnand would be just as pissed become when you are a sire had bought, which, after delivery, the impotent turned out to be.
With kind regards
Hans Melchers (75)
It seems that mr. Melchers quite pissed off. Pon makes no statement about the conflict “view of the customer relationship”, so we are curious what’s going to happen now. Proceedings on the merits and summary proceedings are by Melchers already announced in any case.
Gallery: Bentley Mulsanne
”
”
Gallery: Bentley Flying Spur 2013
”
”