These are the 10 worst cars of 2016
Posted on 20-03-2016 at 17:09 by rynnus – 16 Comments”
What cars can you get the best links? Check out the ten best worst.
It must be said, it is a rash that a number of cars that you in the Netherlands will come, but there are a couple of striking (brand new) cars. It is a American research of Consumer Reports, which ten categories put together and from each category the worst car chose. A perfect list for those for whom the glass is preferably half full. Nonetheless, it is a fairly decent research, because: consumers.
There is an overall score made up, consisting of a driving test score (incl. fuel consumption), trust factor, customer satisfaction, safety and crash test results. Overall score (where the lower, the worse) is behind the name of the car. Let’s start!
Small: Mitsubishi Mirage Rating: 34
Starting with a peanut. The Mirage (also known as Space Star) recently got an update with lots of electronic goodies. However, the weak, vibrating triple tremendously the outside of the boat. In addition, acceleration times do not measure per stopwacht, but a calendar. Very slow. Never buy.
Something less small: Fiat 500L Score: 31
The 500L is uglier than a toothbrush, pews as seats and retrieves a bizarre low betrouwbaarheidsrating. Also, the cushioning is very stiff, not what you want in such a car.
Compact Luxury sedan: Mercedes-Benz CLA250 Score: 53
And then the first German! Research indicates that the motor and gearbox simply sophistication miss. Especially for a Mercedes, these are complaints that you do not like to have. Reliability and customer satisfaction score is low and the starting price is only attractive if you love cars without luxury. Also the interior is poorly damped.
Midsize sedan: Chrysler 200 Score: 51-53
This is a real American that you will never see. Good thing, too, because of all the cars, this is the car with the lowest -predicted – reliability rating.
Midsize Luxury car: Lincoln MKS Score: 59
At least one reaguurder will now be on his edge of his chair… The MKS is actually a Ford Taurus, but then worse. Is now heavily out of date and for its size it feels inside is surprisingly tight. The 3.7 liter V6 would maybe be good, but turns out primarily to be a pain in the ass, when it comes to refinement. But you may have to for that last term but just not to the Americans.
Family SUV: Dodge Journey Score: 45
The Dodge Journey. Already a pretty old model, and scores very poorly in safety. Especially the small-overlap test is a huge obstacle (literally). He now is on sale you would not be curious, it is simply a bumbling old loft with a third row of seats for people without a limb.
Small Luxury SUV: Land Rover Discovery Sport Score: 47
Surprise!!! The latest young Land Rover is doing poorly in his class. He must, above all, against the German three (GLC, X3, and Q5) and that is always difficult. Anyway, consumers are not satisfied with the horkerige gearbox and hard suspension.
Large Luxury SUV: Cadillac Escalade Score: 44
While apartment building is this kind of the most uneconomical new car that you can buy. Moreover, it seems nevertheless, the building exterior, the interior is pretty disappointing. Certainly for the price -which, in America as much as 90 thousand dollars amounts to – is a worthy automobile. But yes, rappers keep on rapping…
MINIVAN: Chrysler Town and Country Score: 62
Formerly known as the popular (also in the Netherlands), Voyager, and today even sell in Europe as Lancia Grand Voyager. The consumption is huge, crash tests show alarming results, and the chairs would be uncomfortable to sit. Helaaspindakaas.
Green Car: Mitsubishi i-MiEV Score: 45
Well, what should we here say about it. If you at all plan to actually purchasing one you probably already no ass from how he scores, because a healthy mind is there really not more. It is in fact a golf cart with a roof, and also very ugly. Consumer Reports writes about the range:
But at least that mediocre range limits the time spent in this subpar automobile.
What to me is an excellent conclusion.